From my experience all of these things mean nearly the same thing; though I do separate them into two categories, as defined below. This is about the style of the person, not the job role itself. Somebody called a “Team Leader” can be a manager the same as someone who is a “Department Manager” could be a leader. Someone could also be both, potentially.
Manager: A manager always has a specific job to do and a bunch of items to manage. Managers tend to be more based on measurable metrics or deliverables and have “business” requirements to meet. Managers are often very effective in short term situations, but not always in achieving long term, sustainable results.
Managers use words like “goal”, “deadline”, “longevity” and “process”
Leader: A leader deals with people, not objectives. The general opinion of a leader is that the person is more important – because happy people achieve greater things. Dealing with a situation, not it’s symptoms. Leaders may not always achieve the best results short term, but are definitely more suited to long term ambitions.
Leaders use words like “achievements” and “motivation” and “loyalty” as well as emotive words such as “passion” and “faith”
I’m not a manager, I manage things I have to. But I am a leader. This means that I am somewhat bias. I value the power of people above the power of anything else. The reason my projects tend to work successfully, in my opinion, is that being a leader everything I do runs with passion; I look for passionate people to work with, who have faith in the cause, whatever that may be.
I believe leadership is more successful than management, and I shall tell you why.
Leadership inspires people. Leaders believe that inspiring and motivating, putting people into positions they love and creating emotional bonds inspires the best results, I agree for a number of reasons. You may think this is all very wishy washy, but I have supporting evidence.
Samurai: some of the most skilled people ever to exist, total and utter dedication; prepared to make any appropriate sacrifice to achieve their goals. Had total faith and loyalty to their cause, it inspired them to be the best they could be.
Winston Churchill, David Beckham and dare I say it, Adolf Hitler: bare with me on this. Winston Churchill lead a country through some of the hardest times it’s ever seen and won us a war against a much more advanced enemy. David Beckham inspires people and becomes a role model for children and athletes world wide. Adolf Hitler made people do unspeakably evil things and believe they were genuinely working for the good of the world; an evil person with horrific goals but a clever leader who knew how to inspire his followers.
Jeff – team leader: achieves business goals by ensuring production rates of maintained. Offers no positive incentives, uses words like “team” without reason and does nothing to inspire the team. Goals are achieved, but staff turnover is as soon as possible due to a lack of inspiration or motivation. Jeff is based on a real person who I worked with a few years back, but to save that person being “named and shamed” I shan’t mention their name.
I am not for one minute saying the workplace should become a hippy fest of people singing kumbaya wearing flowers in their hair. But stop to think about why you’re doing things, speculation leads to accumulation – and an effective team of people can achieve almost anything – if they want to. Loving the product is always the first step.
Bare it in mind next time you’re making a managerial decision. Oh, and for the record, there have been hundreds of famous leaders. Ironically, no famous managers. Which do you think is the most effective?